As the great Anne Lamott so charmingly put it, “Forgiveness means you’ve decided not to kill them.” A lovely sentiment, really. We hand out that kind of grace like it’s a participation trophy, don’t we? It’s easy, almost a performance art. We stand on our moral high ground, nodding sagely at someone else’s obvious character flaws, convinced that our magnanimous gesture of letting them off the hook says something profound about us. The real fun, however, begins when we turn that same breathtaking generosity on ourselves. This is where the whole thing falls apart, where the easy platitudes shrivel up and die. The true measure of our character isn’t how we handle other people’s ridiculous shortcomings, but how we deal with our own. This, my friends, is where the reckoning gets complicated, turning into a full-blown existential cage match with no referee and no clean hits.

It’s a particularly cruel trick for anyone who believes in the inherent goodness of humanity. We’ve built a whole philosophical framework on the belief that human beings are capable of beautiful, resilient things, that we have an innate drive to be better. We champion this grand idea, and then we inevitably make a monumental mess of things. At that point, our own missteps feel less like a simple mistake and more like a profound betrayal of our entire creed. It’s as if our personal failing is evidence, exhibit A in the case against our own worldview. We become our own spiritual auditors, meticulously poring over ledgers of regret, tallying up a debt no one else is even remotely interested in collecting. Who needs a vengeful deity when you have yourself, armed with a perfectly curated list of every stupid thing you’ve ever said or done, ready to prosecute your own soul into eternity? It’s an exhausting and frankly, a spectacularly useless form of self-sabotage.

This is where the humanist’s paradox truly rears its head. As the late, great philosopher Marcus Aurelius once noted, “The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way.” Forgiveness, in this view, isn’t something handed down from on high. It’s an internal process that only we can perform. There is no celestial court to grant us a pardon, no divine intervention to wash away the guilt. We are the architects of our own ethical world, which means we’re also the ones who have to clean up the wreckage. The weight of having to be both the sinner and the savior is a heavy one, isn’t it? This is the ultimate test of our humanity, because without an external source of absolution, the burden falls entirely on our shoulders. It’s an act of radical self-humanism. You are, for better or worse, the only one who can grant yourself a fresh start. The most profound spiritual journey, it turns out, is simply learning to live with the person you became after the person you were made a colossal error in judgment.

So, let’s stop treating self-forgiveness as this grand, solemn ritual. It’s not about magically erasing the past or pretending you were perfect. It’s a pragmatic, slightly cynical decision to stop punishing yourself for the shortcomings of a version of you that doesn’t even exist anymore. That person is a ghost. You’ve changed, you’ve learned, and you’ve probably developed a few new wrinkles of wisdom, so why are you still holding a grudge against a memory? Forgiveness isn’t about a sudden, perfect feeling of peace; it’s a cold, hard decision to get back to the business of living. The truly defiant act isn’t pretending you never stumbled; it’s simply deciding to get back on your feet and be better, if only out of sheer spite for the past. After all, what’s a life worth living if you’re too busy judging the one that’s already gone?

Leave a comment